人家就分享个转校,非要过度解读,比个高下

所有跟帖: 

Can you see the original post below? -burnwoodhot- 给 burnwoodhot 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/11/2023 postreply 22:06:31

我没看原帖,但看到您的主帖太过严肃。所以,说两句,想告诉你,这里不是你熟悉的学术争论场所。That’s it. -追求平凡- 给 追求平凡 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/11/2023 postreply 22:10:42

没看原帖-- then lost a ground to discuss -burnwoodhot- 给 burnwoodhot 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/11/2023 postreply 22:11:43

哈哈哈,凭我对兄贵的了解,他不可能 knowingly misleading. -追求平凡- 给 追求平凡 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/11/2023 postreply 22:16:01

Well, a mistake is a mistake-- no matter it is on purpose -burnwoodhot- 给 burnwoodhot 发送悄悄话 (178 bytes) () 04/11/2023 postreply 22:20:15

in any case, “misleading” and “mistake” are different, right -追求平凡- 给 追求平凡 发送悄悄话 (10 bytes) () 04/11/2023 postreply 22:28:33

Not correction of mistake would become misleading -burnwoodhot- 给 burnwoodhot 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/12/2023 postreply 07:08:16

这坛子里误导多了去了 -徽州老家- 给 徽州老家 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/12/2023 postreply 05:42:30

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!