That is wrong. Undergraduate is more important for forming your

own network and has more impact to your future. For example, if you graduate from Harvad college, the chance of your children get into Harvard is much higher because the legacy acceptance rate is 40-50%. I also know Stanford and MIT have 5-year BS+Ms program. Harvard has 2+2 program: work 2 years after graduation then go to HBS for 2 years. That are many benefits for getting into top schools.

所有跟帖： 

• agree with you 100%. -Big_Benz- ♂ (158 bytes) () 11/13/2007 postreply 13:42:30

• Agree if for business major, especially IB -smiling_face- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/13/2007 postreply 13:48:25

• 让儿子本科进藤是为孙子将来容易？：D -听听意见- ♀ (196 bytes) () 11/13/2007 postreply 14:02:45

• 做小中也蛮吃力的.如果玩嘛,就说是以前上高中没玩够. -打字太累- ♀ (80 bytes) () 11/13/2007 postreply 14:14:13

• 大概你不认识啥藤校毕业的硕博。 -听听意见- ♀ (111 bytes) () 11/13/2007 postreply 14:40:18

• Harvard's legacy only counts undergraduates. Some schools count -lucky8910- ♀ (5 bytes) () 11/13/2007 postreply 14:43:21

• 原来你不喜欢“听听意见”啊？ -打字太累- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/13/2007 postreply 15:43:37

• This is misleading. Everybody studies hard and plays hard. By t -lucky8910- ♀ (87 bytes) () 11/13/2007 postreply 14:22:44

• 我发现这方面我很容易与你不谋而合.;) -黎昉- ♀ (252 bytes) () 11/13/2007 postreply 16:51:44