What you said about two year contracts is untrue!

来源: 很有新意 于 2017-02-28 20:45:53 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (379 bytes)
本帖于 2017-02-28 21:28:36 时间, 由普通用户 很有新意 编辑
回答: 花街老中 vs. 小中 由 career 于 2017-02-28 20:29:15

You have been keeping spreading the false claims about the two year contracts for the new college hires. It is untrue; most major firms, including GS, abolished this policy several years ago. Check out this http://www.cnbc.com/id/49037152

 

所有跟帖： 

• "the late part of the 1998-2007 expansion" vs. your GS from 2012 -career- ♂ 给 career 发送悄悄话 (211 bytes) () 02/28/2017 postreply 20:50:22

• "will be harder for some...to stay on for two years..." -career- ♂ 给 career 发送悄悄话 (1021 bytes) () 02/28/2017 postreply 20:56:29

• I just pointed out your repeated factual error on the two year c -很有新意- ♀ 给 很有新意 发送悄悄话 (227 bytes) () 02/28/2017 postreply 21:15:08

• The 2-yr contract was referred to "late part of the 1998-2007" -career- ♂ 给 career 发送悄悄话 (705 bytes) () 02/28/2017 postreply 21:32:28

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！