参照这个你看看
Unlike a preliminary hearing, held in court with the defense side present, the grand jury does not make its decision in the context of an adversary proceeding. Rather, grand jurors see and hear only what prosecutors put before them. (Prosecutors technically have an obligation to present “exculpatory” evidence—evidence that suggests that a defendant might not be guilty—though there is not much other than the prosecutor’s conscience to enforce this rule.)
In part because there’s no one on the "other side" to contest the prosecutor’s evidence, grand juries almost always return an indictment as requested by the prosecutor. According to a U.S. Department of Justice study on plea bargaining, “Grand juries are notorious for being ‘rubber?stamps’ for the prosecutor for virtually all routine criminal matters.” (Plea Bargaining: Critical Issues and Common Practices, by William F. McDonald, (U.S. DOJ, National Institute of Justice, 1985).)
检方在这次走了起诉的渠道。而且是走的一般会更容易使检方起诉的渠道
所有跟帖:
•
这就是这个检察官的问题所在,法律界抨击这个案子的地方,我前面已经说过了,你还是不明白。
-edison11-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/13/2014 postreply
18:18:09
•
不明白的是你。这句话是什么意思?
-加共-
♂
(396 bytes)
()
12/13/2014 postreply
18:21:42
•
懒得跟你浪费时间,你随便。
-edison11-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/13/2014 postreply
18:50:00
•
你浪费的时间还少呀。呵呵
-加共-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/13/2014 postreply
19:11:05
•
edison11说的是对的。
-偶灯斯陋-
♀
(151 bytes)
()
12/13/2014 postreply
20:08:22