可以不听家长的一面之词，老师的信看了吗？老师都不愿说是否是作弊。

所有跟帖： 

• 老师都不愿说是作弊是不是老师不愿把这事升级呢？你真觉得不是作弊吗？ -老忽叔叔- ♂ (167 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:43:09

• exactly。有些人是捡起鸡毛当令箭。 -燕京十景- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:44:46

• 我觉得不是。否则他是most stupid cheater。 -壮士- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:48:24

• who said he is not stupid? -老忽叔叔- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:49:05

• common sense says so -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:50:26

• common sense says he cheated and he is stupid to have done so. -燕京十景- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:51:59

• that is not your common sense but your bias -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:57:32

• Perhaps your bias -燕京十景- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:58:51

• for two G11 boys, common sense is no writing on table before tes -newcomerST- ♀ (98 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:59:59

• maybe he wanted to show the other student something and forgot t -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (213 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 19:05:42

• you do not mention common sense any more? -newcomerST- ♀ (106 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 19:10:37

• the other part is common sense -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (66 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 19:24:51

• people do their job not do the talk -newcomerST- ♀ (233 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 19:30:34

• i can not believe someone used the word "bitch" -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (12 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 19:33:03

• one thing you said is right: too much sepeculation -newcomerST- ♀ (209 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 19:35:43

• 要不你用中文把你的意思说一遍。俺的英文太差，读不懂你到底说什么。 -老忽叔叔- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:59:39

• i would have said the samething ...:) -20146- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:51:11

• 老师聪明。老师不在现场，不想把自己纠缠进这种会引起争端又无法判断的死角，所以回避。 -princessonthepea- ♀ (56 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:44:04

• 总算有个看懂英文的。 -壮士- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:52:00

• 看问题看关键，不认为是作弊给了0分？法官认定无罪会判坐几年牢？ -飞飞与菲菲- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:44:27

• 菲菲小姐，回去从新读一遍。 -壮士- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:49:27

• 老师给0分，还需要说什么， -20146- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:47:52

• 老师为何给零分？ -壮士- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:50:17

• 你说呢？ -20146- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:52:58

• 看上面。 -壮士- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:55:19

• 违规的实际性质是什么？ 作弊 -20146- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:56:12

• no. teacher was the judge; you are a bystander. -壮士- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:58:37

• 旁观者清不是吗？ -20146- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 19:01:22

• 太对了。你的是旁观者之清。 -壮士- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 19:04:19

• 起码他appears 作弊了不是，所以起码女孩完全没错。妈妈要做的是叫自己孩子一定要小心，貌似作弊的事情都不要做，而不是紧着去怪 -Manymore- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 18:58:37

• 争论有木有作弊好无意义，因为结果和事实无法改变，倒不如省省劲，教导孩子学会保护自己。美帝国是讲rule的地方。 -道可道-非常道- ♀ (184 bytes) () 03/07/2013 postreply 21:15:52

• 老师说的是不管intention是什么，男孩的行为都违反了规定。说明女孩没有造谣，你凭什么侮辱人家？ -江与- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/08/2013 postreply 06:51:59