[老生常谈] 你真的了解 SAT 分数的意义吗?

本帖于 2012-10-29 09:08:39 时间, 由普通用户 湘西山民 编辑

The percentiles that various SAT scores for college-bound seniors correspond to are summarized in the following chart:[17][18]

Percentile Score, 1600 Scale
(official, 2006)
Score, 2400 Scale
(official, 2006)
99.93/99.98* 1600 2400
99+ ** ≥1540 ≥2280
99 ≥1480 ≥2200
98 ≥1450 ≥2140
97 ≥1420 ≥2100
93 ≥1340 ≥1990
88 ≥1280 ≥1900
81 ≥1220 ≥1800
72 ≥1150 ≥1700
61 ≥1090 ≥1600
48 ≥1010 ≥1500
36 ≥950 ≥1400
24 ≥870 ≥1300
15 ≥810 ≥1200
8 ≥730 ≥1090
4 ≥650 ≥990
2 ≥590 ≥890
* The percentile of the perfect score was 99.98 on the 2400 scale and 99.93 on the 1600 scale.
** 99+ means better than 99.5 percent of test takers.

The older SAT (before 1995) had a very high ceiling. In any given year, only seven of the million test-takers scored above 1580. A score above 1580 was equivalent to the 99.9995 percentile.[19]

SAT-ACT score comparisons

Map of states according to high school graduates' (2006) preference of exam. States in orange had more students taking the SAT than the ACT.

Although there is no official conversion chart between the SAT and its biggest rival, the ACT, the College Board released an unofficial chart based on results from 103,525 test takers who took both tests between October 1994 and December 1996;[20] however, both tests have changed since then. Several colleges have also issued their own charts. The following is based on the University of California's conversion chart.[21]

SAT (Prior to Writing Test Addition) SAT (With Writing Test Addition) ACT Composite Score
1600 2400 36
1560–1590 2340–2390 35
1520–1550 2280–2330 34
1480–1510 2220–2270 33
1440–1470 2160–2210 32
1400–1430 2100–2150 31
1360–1390 2040–2090 30
1320–1350 1980–2030 29
1280–1310 1920–1970 28
1240–1270 1860–1910 27
1200–1230 1800–1850 26
1160–1190 1740–1790 25
1120–1150 1680–1730 24
1080–1110 1620–1670 23
1040–1070 1560–1610 22
1000–1030 1500–1550 21
960–990 1440–1490 20
920–950 1380–1430 19
880–910 1320–1370 18
840–870 1260–1310 17
800–830 1200–1250 16
760–790 1140–1190 15
720–750 1080–1130 14
680–710 1020–1070 13
640–670 960–1010 12
600–630 900–950 11

Correlations with IQ

Frey and Detterman (2003) analyzed the correlation of SAT scores with intelligence test scores.[22] They found SAT scores to be highly correlated with general mental ability, or g (r=.82 in their sample, .86 when corrected for non-linearity). The correlation between SAT scores and scores on the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices was .483 (.72 corrected for restricted range). They concluded that the SAT is primarily a test of g. Beaujean and colleagues (2006) have reached similar conclusions.[23]

 

所有跟帖: 

回复:[老生常谈] 你真的了解 SAT 分数的意义吗? -贾庆皋- 给 贾庆皋 发送悄悄话 (106 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:11:53

就是。感觉很多父母还是“从高分到低分”的思路。 -湘西山民- 给 湘西山民 发送悄悄话 湘西山民 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:14:44

那是因为人家花了10分的力气或12的力气, 要理解啊 :))) -QiTian- 给 QiTian 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:16:54

anything is wrong with 人家花了10分的力气或12的力气? -Smart- 给 Smart 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:27:01

这里不是在说择优入取吗? 力气都用完了还能跑多远? :))) -QiTian- 给 QiTian 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:29:01

trying one's best -Smart- 给 Smart 发送悄悄话 (766 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:35:22

我不反对努力, 我也相信10000HR RULE, 但这努力是在孩子PASSION的基础上, 人生有太多的精彩之处, 不能为了分 -QiTian- 给 QiTian 发送悄悄话 (176 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:40:20

i agree with -Smart- 给 Smart 发送悄悄话 (715 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:49:18

回复:anything is wrong with 人家花了10分的力气或12的力气? -贾庆皋- 给 贾庆皋 发送悄悄话 (347 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:35:17

你今天多写点啊,俺会一直拜读, 父母的眼光太重要了 -QiTian- 给 QiTian 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:37:33

回复:你今天多写点啊,俺会一直拜读, 父母的眼光太重要了 -贾庆皋- 给 贾庆皋 发送悄悄话 (325 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:43:43

i guess we just read each other -Smart- 给 Smart 发送悄悄话 (1049 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:42:58

asian children are unfairly grouped together -- I disagree. 78届 -QiTian- 给 QiTian 发送悄悄话 (94 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:47:03

do not know what you r talking about. -Smart- 给 Smart 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:50:38

what I am trying to say -Smart- 给 Smart 发送悄悄话 (345 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:54:11

回复:i guess we just read each other -贾庆皋- 给 贾庆皋 发送悄悄话 (463 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:53:34

teh unfair system causes asian 考生之间恶性竞争的恶果 -Smart- 给 Smart 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:55:21

考几次的还算不算? -stepstephigher- 给 stepstephigher 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:26:07

不复习和上补习班考出相似的成绩能说IQ接近? 人为因素太多了 :))) -QiTian- 给 QiTian 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:27:55

考多次不好,藤校认为很多东西比SAT成绩重要,一个人太专注于SAT考试,会被认为 -edison11- 给 edison11 发送悄悄话 edison11 的博客首页 (29 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:32:04

所以看起来中国的高考还是很合理的,只准考一次,而且给大家一样长的时间准备! -怎么可以瞎说- 给 怎么可以瞎说 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 11:47:27

SAT考满分不是问题,问题是花了多少精力去考满分。如果申请表里除了SAT满分, -edison11- 给 edison11 发送悄悄话 edison11 的博客首页 (104 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 09:29:46

“有钱不是万能的,但没钱是万万不能的”好像也可以用在SAT2400上 -Arya- 给 Arya 发送悄悄话 Arya 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/29/2012 postreply 10:30:49

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!