This review is from: Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother (Hardcover)
Amy Chua has written an authentic, funny and self-deprecating parenting memoir. This is not a guide on how to raise your children, nor does she suggest that it is. And, contrary to some comments found on the internet, Chua does not declare anywhere in this book that the "Chinese" parenting model is superior. Rather, the book is a moving portrait of her evolution from her initially very strict parenting view to a more nuanced approach - as can be seen from the book's very cover in which she highlights how she was "humbled by a 13 year old." This is a hilarious, beautifully written, and touching story filled with love and high hopes for one's children (which pan out, as can be seen in the book and in the interviews Chua and her daughters have done). It is a wonderful read and I devoured it in a matter of hours. I highly recommend this book - the excerpts and articles about the book have generated a lot of publicity but do not capture the author's parenting evolution. Only Chua's witty, unflinchingly honest, and tongue-in-cheek descriptions throughout can convey this to her readers.
这有一篇amazon上的评论,我觉得对Amy的书做了准确的概述
所有跟帖:
•
也是我的感受。看她的书,我笑了很多,也难受过,也有同情,就是没有生气愤怒的感觉,
-20146-
♀
(101 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
07:22:29
•
要是你也能写个读书笔记在这就好了
-Accountant06-
♀
(33 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
07:48:45
•
我很想,但是我对自己的文字表达能力没有信心。
-20146-
♀
(33 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
07:56:29
•
你的能力我有信心!
-Accountant06-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:01:27
•
谢谢鼓励。我试试看:)
-20146-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:02:26
•
大谢牙医!!!等着书评:)
-胡桃架子--
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:27:29
•
期待你的感想!
-美妈的家-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
14:31:02
•
谢谢你的回复。其实我的孩子才是kindergartener,
-hiccupbaby-
♀
(555 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
07:57:29
•
对对对! 我把看书的内容跟老公复述了,我们两个大笑,我比较感慨,毕竟是俺LG:) 说到COCO
-20146-
♀
(176 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:07:08
•
回复:对对对! 我把看书的内容跟老公复述了,我们两个大笑,我比较感慨,毕竟是俺LG:) 说到COCO
-hiccupbaby-
♀
(156 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:16:42
•
回复:SHOULD HAVE BEEN "SELFISHNESS"
-hiccupbaby-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:22:41
•
我可是一直崇拜你的~~~~ 很想读读你的看书体会:))
-香香生煎馒头-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
07:57:49
•
汽水太客气了:) 我能力很有限啊,这书使我感动不假:)
-20146-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:08:19
•
我们生活在age of misinformation 。
-阿Q的日子-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
07:48:53
•
i believe this one (from a harvard educated chinese mom) sums it
-sundawn-
♂
(2943 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:14:57
•
DID YOU READ THE BOOK?
-hiccupbaby-
♀
(24 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:20:44
•
WSJ上开头列的那几条就让我没兴趣了.估计接着读书的都是有闲功夫的:))
-post123-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:23:58
•
Don't judge a book by its cover. :))))))
-20146-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:35:39
•
Why should I care the book?
-post123-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:48:03
•
她引起轰动不也是因为WSJ的文章吗?
-post123-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:50:14
•
for one thing, how do you suppose to go around criticise somethi
-20146-
♀
(54 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:07:08
•
我总可以评论我看到的吧.你欣赏她的PARENT STYLE FIRST, 才去看的书.我没兴趣.但对WSJ
-post123-
♂
(34 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:25:33
•
If you dont care, then why join this discussion?
-hiccupbaby-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:01:05
•
看你们把读了那本书说成就有了评论她的特权,觉得很好笑.
-post123-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:23:06
•
you may laughing at us , you may mocking at her. but you know wh
-20146-
♀
(106 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:28:12
•
看你这几天不遗余力的推销那书更可笑,今天是没憋住:))
-post123-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:31:49
•
她哪里需要我,你真是高估了us both,he:)))))
-20146-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
10:45:14
•
知道吗,这就是媒体的洗脑。 先把偏见种到大众的头脑里。
-hiccupbaby-
♀
(359 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:35:58
•
难道那些不是她做的吗?我不感冒:))
-post123-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:49:16
•
既然如此,就把这本书本身和媒体的stereotype当作两件事,而且我觉得反stereotype比欣赏一本书更为重要和迫切。
-卡莱-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
08:55:35
•
那么更应该反对WSJ这样断章取义的贴标签做法,我们中国人为什么没有看书之前就自动的
-hiccupbaby-
♀
(156 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:10:18
•
这就是我说的.有几个CARE她的书?书又能造成多大影响?大家的反应都是对WSJ造成的轰动而发的
-post123-
♂
(77 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:29:35
•
大众就是这么被煽动
-ctrls-
♂
(246 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:10:27
•
是啊,煽动得挺成功的。这市场学应该好好研究研究......
-us7749-
♀
(64 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:34:12
•
同意大众就是这么被煽动的,媒体的工作就是要引起轰动效应,who cares what the truth is.
-hiccupbaby-
♀
(69 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:39:27
•
你也可以做一篇对Amy的书的更准确概述,看看amazon是否会让你上它的评论。
-冬寒如旧-
♀
(94 bytes)
()
01/13/2011 postreply
09:49:31