别针妈，Congratulations! 在Morse v. Frederick（2007），the S Ct是这么说的：

1. The constitutional rights of students in a public school are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings.

2. School regulations on speech do not violate the Free Speech clause as long as they are reasonably related to school pedagogical concerns.

 

所以我觉得free speech is a non-starter.

 

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• do you think this constitutes school pedagogical concerns? -clipmom- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:40:28

• 维持课堂秩序是这个老师的primary concern，她的信里写得很清楚， -Francine- ♀ (72 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:44:50

• she said "hurt others' feelings" -clipmom- ♀ (241 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:55:31

• Your opinion is respected. -Francine- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:58:43

• So is yours. Night. -clipmom- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:59:13

• 谢谢找来有关材料否则我们的孩子可以被灌输堕胎,吸毒,乱交等等还毫无办法 -weston- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:46:59

• 举手之劳，不谢。 -Francine- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:48:28

• you think no santa is the same as 堕胎,吸毒,乱交 -clipmom- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:51:21

• you think no santa is the same as 堕胎,吸毒,乱交 -clipmom- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:51:26

• Sorry I thought you were beyond these slippery slope arguments. -clipmom- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 20:57:57

• 你的语气太多情绪,你知道学校有权如果这使得你不高兴,too bad -weston- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2010 postreply 21:01:10