也谈富人 - 大富小富 2006年纽约时报的文章

来源: thricemom 2009-12-15 18:47:35 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (4491 bytes)
November 27, 2006
Very Rich Are Leaving the Merely Rich Behind
By LOUIS UCHITELLE
A decade into the practice of medicine, still striving to become ''a well regarded physician-scientist,'' Robert H. Glassman concluded that he was not making enough money. So he answered an ad in the New England Journal of Medicine from a business consulting firm hiring doctors.

And today, after moving on to Wall Street as an adviser on medical investments, he is a multimillionaire.

Such routes to great wealth were just opening up to physicians when Dr. Glassman was in school, graduating from Harvard College in 1983 and Harvard Medical School four years later. Hoping to achieve breakthroughs in curing cancer, his specialty, he plunged into research, even dreaming of a Nobel Prize, until Wall Street reordered his life.

Just how far he had come from a doctor's traditional upper-middle-class expectations struck home at the 20th reunion of his college class. By then he was working for Merrill Lynch and soon would become a managing director of health care investment banking.

''There were doctors at the reunion -- very, very smart people,'' Dr. Glassman recalled in a recent interview. ''They went to the top programs, they remained true to their ethics and really had very pure goals. And then they went to the 20th-year reunion and saw that somebody else who was 10 times less smart was making much more money.''

The opportunity to become abundantly rich is a recent phenomenon not only in medicine, but in a growing number of other professions and occupations. In each case, the great majority still earn fairly uniform six-figure incomes, usually less than $400,000 a year, government data show. But starting in the 1990s, a significant number began to earn much more, creating a two-tier income stratum within such occupations.

The divide has emerged as people like Dr. Glassman, who is 45, latched onto opportunities within their fields that offered significantly higher incomes. Some lawyers and bankers, for example, collect much larger fees than others in their fields for their work on business deals and cases.

Others have moved to different, higher-paying fields -- from academia to Wall Street, for example -- and a growing number of entrepreneurs have seen windfalls tied largely to expanding financial markets, which draw on capital from around the world. The latter phenomenon has allowed, say, the owner of a small mail-order business to sell his enterprise for tens of millions instead of the hundreds of thousands that such a sale might have brought 15 years ago.

Three decades ago, compensation among occupations differed far less than it does today. That growing difference is diverting people from some critical fields, experts say. The American Bar Foundation, a research group, has found in its surveys, for instance, that fewer law school graduates are going into public-interest law or government jobs and filling all the openings is becoming harder.

Something similar is happening in academia, where newly minted Ph.D.'s migrate from teaching or research to more lucrative fields. Similarly, many business school graduates shun careers as experts in, say, manufacturing or consumer products for much higher pay on Wall Street.

And in medicine, where some specialties now pay far more than others, young doctors often bypass the lower-paying fields. The Medical Group Management Association, for example, says the nation lacks enough doctors in family practice, where the median income last year was $161,000.

''The bigger the prize, the greater the effort that people are making to get it,'' said Edward N. Wolff, a New York University economist who studies income and wealth. ''That effort is draining people away from more useful work.''

What kind of work is most useful is a matter of opinion, of course, but there is no doubt that a new group of the very rich have risen today far above their merely affluent colleagues.

Turning to Philanthropy


One in every 825 households earned at least $2 million last year, nearly double the percentage in 1989, adjusted for inflation, Mr. Wolff found in an analysis of government data. When it comes to wealth, one in every 325 households had a net worth of $10 million or more in 2004, the latest year for which data is available, more than four times as many as in 1989.

所有跟帖: 

整天富啊钱啊,多会儿才能超越蜗居心态呢? -盘石过江- 给 盘石过江 发送悄悄话 盘石过江 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 18:53:31

美国人富人多啊,每300家就有一家多于10M. -729418- 给 729418 发送悄悄话 729418 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:05:31

有积累. 财富积累两三代没人摆掉就雄厚了. -worriedmom1- 给 worriedmom1 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:07:35

美国人主要不是靠积累,中国人才更善于积累,美国人更善于消费和慈善。 -caddie- 给 caddie 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:09:38

先积累, 再消费和慈善. -worriedmom1- 给 worriedmom1 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:28:47

遗产税很高,光靠积累也难持久。 -729418- 给 729418 发送悄悄话 729418 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:12:41

还可以了. 现在不知道了. 以前200万以下没有遗产税的. -worriedmom1- 给 worriedmom1 发送悄悄话 (13 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:27:39

有的,2 百万以上55% -729418- 给 729418 发送悄悄话 729418 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:35:32

有的。二百万以上 55% -729418- 给 729418 发送悄悄话 729418 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:37:08

325里就一个10米粒! -朱88- 给 朱88 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:08:37

好像比爬藤容易?三百个好象还爬不出一个藤? -caddie- 给 caddie 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:11:24

不爬了挣10米去了 -朱88- 给 朱88 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:18:03

爬完了也要去挣10米,这个是下一个目标。 -caddie- 给 caddie 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:19:34

想起投坦十年一千万的口号了 :) -729418- 给 729418 发送悄悄话 729418 的博客首页 (19 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:31:20

这篇文章还有好几页呢。不都贴了。贴的目的是想说一样的 -thricemom- 给 thricemom 发送悄悄话 thricemom 的博客首页 (59 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:10:46

说了半天,还是那句:王侯将相宁有种乎? -caddie- 给 caddie 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:12:52

再加一页: -thricemom- 给 thricemom 发送悄悄话 thricemom 的博客首页 (4272 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:13:01

也觉得美国有钱人多,我们这个地方我都看到很多富人。 -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (118 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:32:50

应该说房子上千万不少,一个房子2千万以上的有,但不多。 -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:36:16

富人房子几千万,小康房子几百万,应该挺舒...服的了。 -caddie- 给 caddie 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:44:16

我们这里小康几十万的房子就可以了:--)) -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 19:54:53

看来你们那里房子便宜,贵的地方几十万不敢叫小康。 -caddie- 给 caddie 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 20:03:44

是内地,比德州稍微贵一点,但比东西海岸便宜多了。所以 -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (42 bytes) () 12/15/2009 postreply 20:10:01

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”