對比語言與邏輯更容易看到邏輯學的空洞之處。

I never studied logic, but I still learnt math and physics well, and learnt them joyfully too.

Yet there is no way I could do that with a language.  I must acquire a language before I can compose an essay in it.

Which proves that the capability of working with logic is automatic and requires no external forms as a language does.

吾不是反對邏輯學，作為總結、歸納，提醒和强化一下邏輯的作用還是有意義的。但不能本末倒置，作繭自縛。

所有跟帖： 

• 正是。逻辑与语言不对立。但对有些人来说语能力的落后连累了他们的判断能力。 -stonebench- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 09:00:37

• 逻辑=土壤; 语文=花朵Lack of clarity is due to logic, not writing. -TJKCB- ♀ (531 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 10:21:06

• 所以，你列反辣：）土壤是语言，逻辑是花朵 -stonebench- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 10:30:14

• no logic soil; no flowers.Logic is bone, writing is muscle. -TJKCB- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 10:39:21

• logic first, 语法 is after the fact, as 逻辑学is after 逻辑 -TJKCB- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 10:46:39