这是一共八个非官方专家做的研究报告，大意是

当时世贸楼钢材被高温熔化所需要的高温是飞机燃油和办公室着火的温度远远不够的：

The temperatures required for the observed spherule-formation and evaporation of materials observed in the
WTC dust (table 1) are significantly higher than temperatures reachable by the burning of jet fuel and office
materials in the WTC buildings (table 2). The temperatures required to melt iron (1,538 °C) and molybdenum
(2,623 °C), and to vaporize lead (1,740 °C) and aluminosilicates (~2,760°C), are completely out of reach of the
fires in the WTC buildings (maximum 1,100 °C). We wish to call attention to this discrepancy: the official
view implicating fires as the main cause for the ultimate collapses of the WTC Towers and WTC 7 (FEMA
[13], NIST [15] ) is inadequate to explain this temperature gap and is therefore incomplete at best. The
formation of numerous metal-rich spherules is also remarkable, for it implies formation of high-temperature
droplets of the molten metals, dispersed in the air where they cool to form spherules. As displayed in figures 3
and 4, we observe spherules with high iron and aluminum contents, a chemical signature which is not consistent
with formation from melted s

 

文件链接：
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf

我没时间看全部，也看不懂。有兴趣的可以读一下。

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 真心喜欢你们的轻声细语~~~ -Vivian32817- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 16:46:46

• 就事论事就好办 :-) -云易- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 17:01:31

• 让我感到很不安的是有人跟你的贴竟然否定九一一的真实存在，否则时间早已经抚平我内心的伤痛。望谅解 -金笔- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 18:04:30

• 不走极端，尊重事实就好办。大多数质疑官方报道的恰恰是处于对死者的尊重 -云易- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 18:13:52

• 它这里说的是发现了一些灰烬需要很高的温度产生，但不是普遍现象。就我目眼看到的，燃烧是很局限在被撞部位，因此不排除局部高温 -金笔- ♂ (590 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 18:38:15

• 你想明白了就好。我就想不通。看到这些专家们得分析也觉得很有道理。他们比我这个外行懂得多得多。 -云易- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/13/2023 postreply 06:49:20