Philosophical theories, he suggests, are attempts to answer questions that are not really questions at all (they are nonsense), or to solve problems that are not really problems. He says in proposition 4.003 that:
Most of the propositions and questions of philosophers arise from our failure to understand the logic of our language. (They belong to the same class as the question whether the good is more or less identical than the beautiful.) And it is not surprising that the deepest problems are in fact not problems at all.
虽然你懂的根本算不了哲学，但人家老维说的也不是你。人家说的是那些语言论以前的西方哲学。
而俺的帖子的主要目的，就是分析为啥老维也有局限。
跟泛泛而谈的东西方思维没有关系。你就不要小敏感了。
不服，就去论证老维错了。
没那个本事，就安安静静地待着。不要硬往你的主观印象上扯。
