看下面中英对照的修订稿, 多谢雨果的提醒. 原来的排版确实让人难受

回答: 特别喜欢 <原罪的基因> 一书intools2013-01-12 13:01:08

我的理解(不一定正确/全面):
科学与信仰的不同点:
科学是通过证伪(打假)而不断的发展变化的. 属于修正主义. 朝令夕改, 不觉丢人, 反而很荣耀.
信仰则不能轻易改变(思想守旧),创新以后面目全非, 如何让人去信? 信仰的最高境界是"两个凡是".

引用 Duve: Evolution is a fact. It was a theory two centries ago, when Larmarck and Erasmus Darwin (注解: Charles Darwin 的爷爷,有其爷必然有其孙) first proposed it, just as heliocentrism was a theory in the days of Copernius and Galileo. Evolution is no longer a theory, just as heliocentrism is no longer a theory; it is a fact. The Catholic Church has recognized this with remarkable promptness, as compared to the Galileo affair. On October 22, 1996, at a meeting of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Pope John Paul II solemnly announced that "evolution is more than an hypothesis". He did admittedly retreat somewhat to make a special case for the creation of the human soul; and his successor has retreated even further by leaning in favor of the so-called theory of intelligent design. Nevertheless, biological evolution is not negated by the Catholic Church. Such is not the case for several other religious groups.

所有跟帖: 

信仰也需实证。 -squirrel_6- 给 squirrel_6 发送悄悄话 squirrel_6 的博客首页 (552 bytes) () 01/13/2013 postreply 09:50:31

Macro evolution is still a speculation. It will always be until -QualityWithoutName- 给 QualityWithoutName 发送悄悄话 QualityWithoutName 的博客首页 (384 bytes) () 01/13/2013 postreply 14:06:28

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!