Thanks for your input. Kennedy did get off on the right

来源: renqiulan 于 2023-01-10 17:44:38 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (0 bytes)
本帖于 2023-01-10 17:45:13 时间, 由普通用户 renqiulan 编辑
回答: Americans have done a good job in studying Mao & Co. 由 冯墟 于 2023-01-10 17:32:36

所有跟帖： 

• foot when he seriously tried to read Mao's mind. -renqiulan- ♂ 给 renqiulan 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/10/2023 postreply 17:45:57

• China published some of the works on Mao by Americans, -冯墟- ♂ 给 冯墟 发送悄悄话 冯墟 的博客首页 (37 bytes) () 01/10/2023 postreply 17:57:11

• Thanks. I'm aware of that. Color me skeptical, but I'm not -renqiulan- ♂ 给 renqiulan 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/10/2023 postreply 18:01:49

• partly b/c Chinese themselves can't write about him candidly -冯墟- ♂ 给 冯墟 发送悄悄话 冯墟 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/10/2023 postreply 18:04:14

• Point taken. Thanks. -renqiulan- ♂ 给 renqiulan 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/10/2023 postreply 18:07:30

• sure about accuracy.But then,virtually nothing is apolitical -renqiulan- ♂ 给 renqiulan 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/10/2023 postreply 18:06:37

• sometimes inaccuracy was not unintentional... -冯墟- ♂ 给 冯墟 发送悄悄话 冯墟 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/10/2023 postreply 18:11:12

• Worse, parts of the books have been edited out stealthily. -renqiulan- ♂ 给 renqiulan 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/10/2023 postreply 18:35:16

• what do you expect? -冯墟- ♂ 给 冯墟 发送悄悄话 冯墟 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/10/2023 postreply 19:01:45

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！