If your household income is less than 300K and you are buying

LV bags, you are not living within your mean. It is as simple as that.

所有跟帖： 

• why 300K? many LVs are less than $1500 and very durable -柳MM- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 17:19:28

• 洗耳恭听， why $300K, why not $400k,500k,1mil..... -霹雳贝贝- ♀ (50 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 17:52:57

• Only top 1% of the people have 300K household income.LV is desig -Nara- ♀ (59 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 18:08:08

• 哦？ -霹雳贝贝- ♀ (217 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 19:39:07

• Their marketing people can explain who they are targeting. -Nara- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 19:47:10

• 我以为你是LV的marketing people呢。谁定的300K呢？ -小漫- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 19:59:01

• 那买Chanel呢？得500K了？门槛够高的。 -小漫- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 20:00:28

• 你想买就买。每个消费品在设计前都有targeting消费者的. -Nara- ♀ (29 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 20:12:08

• targetting population 不只看收入吧 -柳MM- ♀ (94 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 20:23:50

• 好像跟你前面说的有冲突哦，现在又是买的起就买了，那你前 -霹雳贝贝- ♀ (339 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 20:54:09

• 我破产了........ -小小巧克力豆- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/12/2008 postreply 08:24:39

• LV是平民奢侈品罢了，不用神话了 -柳MM- ♀ (175 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 20:18:58

• 就是. -duckpear- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2008 postreply 22:29:45

• Half of the housewives going to Ranch 99 for grocery shopping -DrWatson- ♀ (18 bytes) () 12/12/2008 postreply 11:18:27

• 天啊! 摆脱你main Street就不要替我们Wall street 说话了. -shuaya- ♀ (60 bytes) () 12/12/2008 postreply 06:01:45