致闫丽梦的支持者:闫丽梦自己写的文章说“新冠病毒的复杂性提示实验室改造”,而不是她以前声称的“新冠来自军方实验室”

来源: 杨别青 2020-09-14 10:31:22 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (4687 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 杨别青 ] 在 2020-09-14 10:39:14 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

Journal article Open Access

Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route

Yan, Li-MengKang, ShuGuan, JieHu, Shanchang

 

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has led to over 910,000 deaths worldwide and unprecedented decimation of the global economy. Despite its tremendous impact, the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has remained mysterious and controversial. The natural origin theory, although widely accepted, lacks substantial support. The alternative theory that the virus may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into the relevant research laboratories. It also argues for a critical look into certain recently published data, which, albeit problematic, was used to support and claim a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. From a public health perspective, these actions are necessary as knowledge of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and of how the virus entered the human population are of pivotal importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in preventing similar, future pandemics.

所有跟帖: 

这与她在媒体或自媒体采访说法大不一样,当初信誓旦旦的说新冠病毒来自军方实验室 -杨别青- 给 杨别青 发送悄悄话 杨别青 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 10:34:33

“而不是事实”这句话在文章里出现了,还是你自己加上去的? -高筋粉- 给 高筋粉 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 10:37:13

谢谢提醒,我加了区别 -杨别青- 给 杨别青 发送悄悄话 杨别青 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 10:39:35

科学论文,和口头采访,用词造句自然会有不同吧? -高筋粉- 给 高筋粉 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 10:42:45

闫等人的文章说大量事实与"病毒自然起源"的理论形成尖锐矛盾,异常的基因特征指向"病毒源于实验室"。 -法眼- 给 法眼 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 10:48:10

等过了peer review. 才有认真对待的必要 -SwiperTheFox- 给 SwiperTheFox 发送悄悄话 SwiperTheFox 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 10:52:09

对,一边倒的声音 -dandinglity- 给 dandinglity 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 11:01:08

说法有矛盾吗?“复杂性提示实验室改造”不能来自军方实验室? -秋高气爽92- 给 秋高气爽92 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 11:04:47

A second report will come out soon! -Jack_J- 给 Jack_J 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 11:14:50

您没有念全文吧? -栀子花蚊子草- 给 栀子花蚊子草 发送悄悄话 栀子花蚊子草 的博客首页 (56 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 13:30:27

您没有念完整篇文章吧 -栀子花蚊子草- 给 栀子花蚊子草 发送悄悄话 栀子花蚊子草 的博客首页 (56 bytes) () 09/14/2020 postreply 13:33:48

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”