美国最高法院维持obamacare所有所有所有所有所有所有所有条款!!!!

本帖于 2012-07-02 14:51:42 时间, 由版主 人在北美版主 编辑

 

10:00 AM ET

Supreme Court upholds entire health care law

Editor's note: We're live blogging from the Supreme Court today as the nation waits to see how the justices will rule on the health care law. You can follow along below as CNN Supreme Court Producer Bill Mears and Senior Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin get the latest details live from the court as well as analysis when the opinion is delivered. Watch live coverage and analysis on CNN TV, CNN’s mobile apps and http://cnn.com/live.

[Updated at 10:16 a.m. ET] Kate Bolduan reports that the Chief Justice John Roberts issued a long opinion in which he said the controversial individual mandate may be upheld and is within Congress’ power under the taxing clause rather than the commerce clause.

[Updated at 10:15 a.m. ET] The Supreme Court has upheld the entire health care law by a vote of 5 to 4, Supreme Court Producer Bill Mears said. That includes the medicare provision

[Updated at 10:06 a.m. ET] In a landmark decision that will impact the nation for decades, the Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a key provision of President Barack Obama's health care law, ruling that requiring people to have health insurance violates the Constitution.

Chief Justice John Roberts had noted that however that the mandate would have been struck down based on the commerce clause , saying it would "open a new and vast domain" for Congressional power.

[Updated at 10:00 a.m. ET] A federal law making it a crime to falsely claim military medals earned was struck down Thursday by the Supreme Court. The 6-3 ruling was a free speech victory  but perhaps in name only - for a onetime California public official who publicly lied about winning the prestigious Medal of Honor.

所有跟帖: 

Yeah ! noso lost again ! -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:24:40

这就是我说的,好的法官不应该干涉行政和立法的重大法令。 -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:26:14

94! 理论上是的!实行有政治难度。 -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:29:19

现在你看到了真正高级法官是准讯common law的传统:遵循先例,不破坏行政 -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:31:42

是!其他都不是真正高级法官,而是裆棍!^_^ -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:34:38

正相反,最高法院好像高度干涉了 -徒劳- 给 徒劳 发送悄悄话 (121 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:30:53

no, 最高法院的判决书不是这么写的,人家的意思是: -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (70 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:33:24

哈哈哈哈哈! -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:37:37

没想到主大法官罗伯茨是叛徒:D -徒劳- 给 徒劳 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:26:59

萝卜是个好法官,他知道哪些是他管,哪些他不该插手。 -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:30:19

嗯!John是个好法官。 -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:31:48

这才是良心和民主的组合。 -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2012 postreply 07:30:30

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!