For those who put your hope on Cain, WAKE UP!

From the surface, 999 plan was very appealing.  It's nothing but smoke mirror.

999 plan said, "no tax loophole, everyone pays same %".  Cain changed his plan several times later:

1. If you were in economical harsh area, you should not pay 9%, you should pay less.

2. If the company is buying America, you can deduct tax.

...

These are new loopholes in my book!

Lawyers and accountants would fight against this plan furiously, so the chance of getting it passed in congress is close to 0.

What to be excited about if you know for sure it's plan will end up miscarried?!

所有跟帖: 

We like 9.99, and we do not like Cain ! -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (106 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:40:10

he really doesn't have a plan, just an idea to entertain :D -planojw- 给 planojw 发送悄悄话 planojw 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:41:12

I know, I know. He does not have ground operations -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (388 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:45:41

No another Black guy, period. For current Prz, GOP -wxc1204- 给 wxc1204 发送悄悄话 (180 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 14:01:12

before rich and poor fight against this plan -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (49 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:45:13

CPA will fight against it for sure :)))))) -Teaparty- 给 Teaparty 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:45:59

no more tax CPA, no more tax lawyer. only auditor. -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:03:48

Get rid of IRS and CPA. Be a liberatarian or tea bagger. -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:57:59

yes we can yes we can yes we can yes we can yes we can yes we ca -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:09:45

At lease, it is a WAKE-UP call!:) -Teaparty- 给 Teaparty 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:47:42

Go Cains, Go! 就爱捣乱 -虞美人怀古- 给 虞美人怀古 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:49:59

Go Cains, Go 虞美人! Bu爱捣乱 -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:52:03

if there are ifs, there are work for lawyers and accountants -秋色满院- 给 秋色满院 发送悄悄话 秋色满院 的博客首页 (624 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:56:11

现在美国的问题是jobjobjob. 没有job哪来tax? -徒劳- 给 徒劳 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:27:28

job is the whole idea of 999 plan -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (61 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:29:07

does that mean bringing jobs back to US? I don't think so -徒劳- 给 徒劳 发送悄悄话 (69 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:33:45

我认为不会 -sts135- 给 sts135 发送悄悄话 (47 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:47:43

这只是GOP的借口。我不觉得两者有必然的联系 -徒劳- 给 徒劳 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:45:41

工作始终会流向人工低的地方 -sts135- 给 sts135 发送悄悄话 (75 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:50:01

Exactly -徒劳- 给 徒劳 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:55:12

Basic Economics: People create jobs because of market demand -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (129 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 14:01:06

额外的demand哪里来? -sts135- 给 sts135 发送悄悄话 (149 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 14:19:08

没有额外的demand企业就不会创造新的就业机会. -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (125 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 15:06:58

但是,美国的现实是,就算你有tax break,工作还是外流。 -sts135- 给 sts135 发送悄悄话 (248 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 15:34:37

可以很明确的告诉你,不是所有企业都无限制的压榨工人。 -SJSharks- 给 SJSharks 发送悄悄话 (104 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 16:10:08

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!