Because this figure was much

来源: panlm_ 2015-01-29 17:19:47 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (611 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ panlm_ ] 在 2015-01-29 18:05:33 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
underestimated. In fact, China 2013 physical GDP per capita was about 60% of the US counterpart (see the CIA World Factbook), about $5600 US; Using this figure times 5, you will get $28000 - that was the China 2013 GDP per capita. Otherwise, it is hard to explain the economic phenomena and scale of China.

1. In 2013, China produced 56% of iron and steel of the world.

2.In 2013, China consumed 60% of cement of the world.

3. In 2013, A Chinese people consumed more meat than an American did.

..... 

所有跟帖: 

这个解释说得通, 但又个疑问: 如果这样, RMB就被低估了5倍, 似乎也不合理.. -hillhawkus- 给 hillhawkus 发送悄悄话 hillhawkus 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 17:35:21

The factor could be as high as 6. -panlm_- 给 panlm_ 发送悄悄话 (411 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 17:43:56

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”