You are wrong again

来源: abcdef654321 于 2012-04-10 20:21:30 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (217 bytes)

According to your own post, it is NOT "必须等立案调查后". As long as there is an initial investigation that shows clear evidence, a person can be sacked. "立案调查" happens LATER. This is exactly what happened.

所有跟帖： 

• 别胡搅了, 知道为什么GCD的条例, 这么严格吗? 是为了避免冤假错案. -hillhawkus- ♂ 给 hillhawkus 发送悄悄话 hillhawkus 的博客首页 (277 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 20:30:19

• that is really stupid -abcdef654321- ♂ 给 abcdef654321 发送悄悄话 (501 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 20:44:33

• 断章取义, 可建议对其采取停职检查措施。 -hillhawkus- ♂ 给 hillhawkus 发送悄悄话 hillhawkus 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 20:49:11

• the 建议 is apparently taken. -abcdef654321- ♂ 给 abcdef654321 发送悄悄话 (41 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 20:59:15

• 所以, 立案在前, 然后建议, 处分在最后. 看明白次序了? -hillhawkus- ♂ 给 hillhawkus 发送悄悄话 hillhawkus 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:02:18

• I will say it again (copied from my early post) -abcdef654321- ♂ 给 abcdef654321 发送悄悄话 (243 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:07:14

• 哎............................................ -hillhawkus- ♂ 给 hillhawkus 发送悄悄话 hillhawkus 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:08:37

• OK, I am wrong -abcdef654321- ♂ 给 abcdef654321 发送悄悄话 (669 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 22:29:05

• 初步调查 => sacked => 立案调查 -abcdef654321- ♂ 给 abcdef654321 发送悄悄话 (184 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:09:45

• 原贴中的[初步调查]是指, 立案之后的调查组[初步调查]. 不要跟立案之前的[初步核实], -hillhawkus- ♂ 给 hillhawkus 发送悄悄话 hillhawkus 的博客首页 (99 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:19:55

• OK, you are right, -abcdef654321- ♂ 给 abcdef654321 发送悄悄话 (776 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 22:15:36

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！