事情不能单凭想象。你太幼稚。

1. 学生开始要求是正当的。但是，后来演变成了暴乱：阻挡戒严部队执行任务，抢军帽，砸军车，抢枪支。六四是暴乱，有问题吗？那幅螳臂当坦克的照片你没有看到过？你想过没有，那时在阻挡执行命令的戒严部队！
不能用intention的好坏来说明手段的好坏或结果的好坏。多数学生开始时的intention或许是好的，但不排除参与其中的一些人的intention与学生的intention是不一致的，比如，万润南先生的intention与学生的就不一致。

2. 你怎么知道“The only thing he had to do is to admit the nature of 64 was indeed contra-revolutionary. ”？事情这么简单？你太幼稚了，也太听信某些别有用心的人的话了。

3. "who stood up for the value of deceased students?" If this can be a question, then we can ask more as follows:
who stood up for the value of deceased soldiers (both sides) in WWII?
who stood up for the value of deceased KMD soldiers in the civil war?
who stood up for the value of deceased ......?

所有跟帖： 

• maybe, -安贝儿- ♀ (1487 bytes) () 03/06/2007 postreply 09:32:58

• Same for me. You are right here. I have to say what I have to sa -永不认输- ♂ (118 bytes) () 03/06/2007 postreply 09:37:07

• OK, i break my promise. -安贝儿- ♀ (494 bytes) () 03/06/2007 postreply 09:44:03

• Bye -永不认输- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/06/2007 postreply 09:50:17