CNN从头到尾进行了跟踪报道?I was following every move, CNN

had not report correctly and bias was clearly seen. Up till a couple of days ago when they made that public statement, they revised all their old posts to be more moderate, but I remember most of their words before that move. Why do you I'm actively protesting and sparing a great deal of effort on this if a large amount of bias from western media wasn't generated toward this incident? Be it by "accident", be it journalistic error, be it cold war anti-communist bias, all of these had been promoting the same kind of bias effect. But, there are how many that apologize for using bad footage and self correct itself? I've been living here for 20+ years and seen much western objective media, but this time, it had completely gone haywire. And if you don't think so, maybe values from the west such as independent thinking are not learnt or is it more of a intelligence issue?

所有跟帖： 

• well said! -tz2000- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/25/2008 postreply 14:01:18

• if media is not open, western media could have said -thrawn- ♂ (480 bytes) () 03/25/2008 postreply 15:32:02

• Then perhaps you should take a lead and do not confuse -thrawn- ♂ (137 bytes) () 03/25/2008 postreply 17:03:24

• There are lots of turists and NGOs in Lhasa. -tekin- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/26/2008 postreply 14:27:18

• They all witnessed violent attack by mobs on Lhasa. -tekin- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/26/2008 postreply 14:28:48

• But western media still call this a "peaceful protest". -tekin- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/26/2008 postreply 14:30:27

• Media in the West decided to lie in the 1st place. -tekin- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/26/2008 postreply 14:31:53

• So China has every right to invite liars to leave. -tekin- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/26/2008 postreply 14:33:13

• Exactly as you said! -ptyr1068- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/25/2008 postreply 16:32:55