disagree

试想,如果上世纪初就普及了计算机技术,谁能保证计划经济就会败给市场经济?

i disagree with this point. The fialure of the planned economy has nothing to do with technology! It is due to the misalignment of incentives that destroy the work ethics. In brief, economic agents are all caught in the prisoner's dilemma game in planned economies. The planned economies will fail again today even with the new tech in computer. This point should be very clear. Otherwise, why China went through the reform?

所有跟帖: 

回复:disagree -唵啊吽- 给 唵啊吽 发送悄悄话 唵啊吽 的博客首页 (367 bytes) () 12/07/2006 postreply 11:32:18

回复:回复:disagree -fbahjh- 给 fbahjh 发送悄悄话 (669 bytes) () 12/07/2006 postreply 19:29:37

回复:回复:回复:disagree -唵啊吽- 给 唵啊吽 发送悄悄话 唵啊吽 的博客首页 (119 bytes) () 12/08/2006 postreply 06:18:52

回复:回复:回复:回复:disagree -fbahjh- 给 fbahjh 发送悄悄话 (595 bytes) () 12/08/2006 postreply 16:52:59

You have your point -唵啊吽- 给 唵啊吽 发送悄悄话 唵啊吽 的博客首页 (431 bytes) () 12/09/2006 postreply 04:46:47

计划经济不一定败给市场经济,关键是要计划好,整体规划优化比局部优 -空谷03- 给 空谷03 发送悄悄话 (184 bytes) () 12/07/2006 postreply 22:40:29

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!