I dont consider benefiting from air superiority as "weakness"

来源: cooldw57 2006-09-29 21:38:14 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (948 bytes)
If you take a look of today's USMC's combat doctrine, it's fairly easy to note that using your precision guided weapons is always your top priority. Casualty reduction could only be achieved by utilizing every high tech toy they've got. Ground troops only come in after complete destruction of target of interest.

You could probably jam the entire GPS band with minimal amount of power output, in fact, GPS signals are extremely vulnerable against any EW attack. USMC and US Army chain of command is well aware of this potential threat. There are numerous feasible alternatives available: LINK16, FORCE NET, other advanced C4I network etc. DoD spent billions each year to Defense contractors on such military innovations, There are always counter-measure and even counter-counter-measure in development in EW fields

Anyhow, I just want to conclude that heavy reliance on air superiority and high tech toys is hardly a weakness.
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”