You are right but you think that the offenders will be

so aggressive to send their aircrafts deep in land without knowing defenders' deployment? If the offenders' objective is to secure the ocean they would just dispatch air patrols in that area. If they consider an amphibian plan combined navy and air support plus marine landing will be planned, air force is not the sole power here

所有跟帖： 

• I'm just talking about land based AAs which will use terrain. -thrawn- ♂ (476 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 10:49:56

• My point was: such trick won't be successful because -Giantfan- ♂ (223 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 11:04:19

• please look at the recent Isreal and US battles. Which -thrawn- ♂ (135 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 12:18:16

• 1. They faced inferior armies technology wise; Air superiority -Giantfan- ♂ (637 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 13:32:37

• You are right about number 1, but in order for us to -thrawn- ♂ (792 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 16:33:16

• strategic bombers can travel into territories with -thrawn- ♂ (697 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 12:29:36

• If I am not mistaken strategic bombers can climb up to -Giantfan- ♂ (480 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 13:41:31

• I don't think strategical bombers can climb that high, -thrawn- ♂ (468 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 16:26:39