很多年以前密苏里州有过类似情况,后来结果证明可悲之人必有可恨之处

在NPR上听到过这个故事,后来还去研究了一下

感兴趣的可以看看这个https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-298.pdf

20年前,堪萨斯市公立学区以种族隔离的理由告了州政府,官司一直打到联邦最高法院。后来高院以5:4判政府败诉。结果给当地加了不少税,用来补贴学校,甚至用校车把贫穷家庭的孩子送到别的校区上学。

For decades critics of the public schools have been saying, "You can't solve educational problems by throwing money at them." The education establishment and its supporters have replied, "No one's ever tried." In Kansas City they did try. To improve the education of black students and encourage desegregation, a federal judge invited the Kansas City, Missouri, School District to come up with a cost-is-noobject educational plan and ordered local and state taxpayers to find the money to pay for it. Kansas City spent as much as $11,700 per pupil(这是二十年前的水平)--more money per pupil, on a cost of living adjusted basis, than any other of the 280 largest districts in the country. The money bought higher teachers' salaries, 15 new schools, and such amenities as an Olympic-sized swimming pool with an underwater viewing room, television and animation studios, a robotics lab, a 25-acre wildlife sanctuary, a zoo, a model United Nations with simultaneous translation capability, and field trips to Mexico and Senegal. The student-teacher ratio was 12 or 13 to 1, the lowest of any major school district in the country. The results were dismal. Test scores did not rise; the black-white gap did not diminish; and there was less, not greater, integration. The Kansas City experiment suggests that, indeed, educational problems can't be solved by throwing money at them, that the structural problems of our current educational system are far more important than a lack of material resources, and that the focus on desegregation diverted attention from the real problem, low achievement. 

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!