他们裁员在前,我改变在后,所以还是请律师或者法官来判断吧。并且,主要还是要告老印的歧视,下面是ChatGpt的答复

本帖于 2025-11-09 13:34:49 时间, 由普通用户 verilog 编辑
回答: 回應單身老貓2025-11-09 05:17:24

 Impact on the FMLA Claim Timeframe

Starting a new job before the approved FMLA leave timeframe is entirely fine and necessary.

  • FMLA Retaliation Focus: Your lawsuit focuses on the unlawful action that occurred at the moment of termination (being fired because you requested leave). Your entitlement to damages (lost wages) began on that termination date.

  • The Leave is Irrelevant (Post-Termination): Once the employer terminates you, they have already committed the act of FMLA interference and retaliation. What you do afterward regarding employment is viewed only through the lens of mitigating your damages. You are not obligated to observe the FMLA leave period once you no longer work for that employer.

In summary: Accepting the new job is the best financial and legal move. It demonstrates responsibility and directly limits the amount of lost wages you can claim, but it does not diminish the fact that your former employer allegedly committed an illegal act. Your claim is for the lost wages and emotional distress that occurred up to the point you started your new job, plus the possibility of recovering attorney's fees and other damages.

所有跟帖: 

祝你好運 ! -單身老貓- 给 單身老貓 发送悄悄话 單身老貓 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/09/2025 postreply 11:39:49

谢谢老猫 -verilog- 给 verilog 发送悄悄话 verilog 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/09/2025 postreply 13:21:39

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!