回复：Can he look into the possibility of adverse possession?

記不記得 "Ah ! ECHO" for Adverse possession 的問題,


"A"ctual possession of the property
"E"xclusive use of the property
"C"ontinuous use of the property
"H"ostile or adverse use of the property
"O"pen and notorious use of the property

在"Fitch v. Slama"的案件中,我們可以看到
A Wall between two neighbors, "A mere temporary use of the property by a trespasser at intervals, whether remote or frequent, is not enough" (to to be effective against a true owner).

Where wall had been built when properties were under common ownership, intent that wall should be boundary line fence could not be inferred from its mere existence