每州法律文字不一样,可在这个问题上都大同小异,没有分歧。你如果有充分理由认为你或别人的安全受到严重威胁就有权利开枪。开枪后受不受起诉,起诉后能不能定罪只能看陪审团,陪审团由和你相似的人组成。
"A person is justified in using deadly force against an attacker to protect another person if he would be justified to use it to protect himself against an unlawful attack and he reasonably believes his intervention is immediately necessary to protect the other person from serious injury or death."
shoot first law. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/07/us/07shoot.html
http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/weapons/self_defense.html
http://www.self-defender.net/law3.htm
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN2721289620070327
老猫对美国枪文化不太了解。守法的公民拥有枪支是对罪犯最有力的喝止,法律,民意,文化都在这一边,我们呼唤华人英雄。
回复:擁有槍枝, 攜帶槍支與使用槍支是三件完全不同的事.
所有跟帖:
•
嘿嘿,好一個"老猫对美国枪文化不太了解",老貓真的無話可說.
-單身老貓-
♂
(102 bytes)
()
03/10/2009 postreply
12:24:42
•
没别的意思,我就是不明白
-买枪是义务-
♂
(437 bytes)
()
03/10/2009 postreply
13:38:37