Old Cat, what is the legal ground for the ownership of those tow

来源: justwandering 2009-03-04 21:53:55 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (513 bytes)
Old cat, I am interested to know the legal ground for the ownership of those two Qing dynasty bronzes (rabbit and rat heads) claimed by their current owner?
By the same token, if the Japanese occupation of Diao Yu Island becomes a fact (actually it is now), does China or Taiwan lose its legal ground to claim it?
Your academic point of view may provide the Chinese government to act on disputed artifacts or disputed territories now.

This discussion should be restricted purely to academic purpose.

所有跟帖: 

很抱歉,老貓也有全職的工作,不可能有時間評論這些問題 -單身老貓- 给 單身老貓 发送悄悄话 單身老貓 的博客首页 (51 bytes) () 03/05/2009 postreply 06:27:53

what legal ground? u got a bigger gun, u got legal ground -tank- 给 tank 发送悄悄话 (50 bytes) () 03/05/2009 postreply 12:03:56

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”