可不可以請您指出在加州的法律中有那一條如您所說的.

老貓不是好學生,所以上學時沒有用心,因此還真的沒有聽說過加州有"Marriage Law",當然老貓聽說過一些其他的東西,例如
CALIFORNIA FAMILY CODE,當然您學有所成,所以好不好,請您告訴老貓您所提出的資料是在法規中的那一條,老貓知道您很忙,所以替您找到了下列的URL,方便您查尋,
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=fam&codebody=&hits=20
就請您告訴老貓那一條有如您所說的規定. 謝謝您.
(PS: Case Law 或是 Hone Rule,就無需討論了)
當然了,您是專家,所以老貓猜想您是否是指的是
Davis v. Davis
Not Reported in N.W.2d, 1998 WL 1991809
Mich.App.,1998
這個判例或是
Poore v. Poore
Not Reported in S.W.3d, 2002 WL 181361
Tenn.Ct.App.,2002.


只是在Poore v. Poore的判決中,有這麼一段話,(當然老貓英文不大好,或許沒有看懂這個意思,好不好請您指點一下)
Persons who are not a child's biological parent do not have the same constitutionally
protected parenting interests possessed by a biological parent. Accordingly, when faced
with competing custody claims by a biological parent and a third party, the courts must
favor the biological parent. The courts cannot award custody to a third party instead of a
biological parent unless the third party can demonstrate that the child will be exposed to
substantial harm if custody is awarded to the biological parent. In other words,
a biological parent cannot be denied custody unless he or she is found to be unfit


謝謝您的指教.

所有跟帖： 

• 对不起是 CA Family Code § 7541 -过来之人- ♂ (298 bytes) () 01/12/2009 postreply 14:24:55

• thank you for the info, but -如尘- ♀ (823 bytes) () 01/12/2009 postreply 15:29:16

• 回复：对不起是 CA Family Code § 7541 -單身老貓- ♂ (1809 bytes) () 01/12/2009 postreply 16:00:09

• 回复：回复：对不起是 CA Family Code § 7541 -單身老貓- ♂ (3216 bytes) () 01/12/2009 postreply 16:12:18

• 484这个意思：我养了你两年，所以我有资格当你爸， -如尘- ♀ (101 bytes) () 01/12/2009 postreply 16:26:44

• 呵呵，是吗 -如尘- ♀ (33 bytes) () 01/14/2009 postreply 19:15:49

• 另外， -如尘- ♀ (50 bytes) () 01/14/2009 postreply 19:19:20

• Please refer to the link @ section H5.1 -过来之人- ♂ (171 bytes) () 01/13/2009 postreply 10:59:24

• 如果这是所有的根据，你的结论肯定不成立。 -如尘- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/13/2009 postreply 15:54:40

• 回复：Please refer to the link @ section H5.1 -單身老貓- ♂ (1631 bytes) () 01/14/2009 postreply 13:35:12