This is the worst reasoning about the whole

来源: mdgg 2008-08-30 07:55:07 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (959 bytes)
thing I heared so far -- glad she is not my dentist! She might be a good dentist to you, but her claims as you described is just, well, wrong!

1. By simply looking at those pictures she can determine those teeth are baby(primary) teeth?

2. Basic human anatomy 101 here. During a "normal" smile, one will expose about 12 teeth -- 6 upper and 6 lower. They are the frontal and lateral incisors (8 of them, replaced by 8 years old already), and the 4 canines (replaced 9-12 yrs old). From those pictures, one can see less than 6 teeth. So those girls are around 8 years old?

BTW, please tell that dentist that she might have a stronger argument if she can see a missing tooth from the pictures because that means those girls have just sheded their baby teeth so they HAVE TO be less than 16 yrs old.

To answer your question: yes, there are methods to determine a person's age -- but not by looking at a randomly-taking picture.
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”