About married resident alien (for tax purpose) with spouse in China.
There have been discussions here about that back a week or two ago. I called IRS and got their authoritative answer. Share this info with you :)
Case specifics:
1. One spouse must be able to elect to be a resident alien filing 1040 (A).
2. The other spouse is in China.
For the best interest of the couple, file this way:
1. File joint return, make the choice of “Treat non-resident spouse as resident alien”.
2. You must report the income of the spouse in China on 1040 line 7.
3. You can claim $3050 exemption for the spouse.
4. You can take a standard deduction of $9500 since you file a joint return.
5. The spouse can exclude foreign earned income up to $80,000. This would take out anything you put in line 7 in above 2, since most people in China do not make $80,000.
6. The spouse needs ITIN. File W-7. Even the spouse has never been in US, he/she can apply for ITIN by *** Filing W-7 together with the joint return ***. The spouse cannot file W-7 by itself – meaning: not attaching it to 1040.
Net effects: compared with filing separately or as single (without taking the spouse into account), your taxable income is reduced by $3050 + $4750. This could mean thousands of tax dollars depending on your tax bracket.
What you cannot do:
Neither of you cannot claim any tax treaty benefits.
关于一方在中国TAX.
所有跟帖:
•
stp 请看看
-H-1B_tax-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/06/2004 postreply
16:57:56
•
今年这个坛子对UNCLE SAM的贡献大大的!
-Windlight-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/06/2004 postreply
17:39:26
•
我知道这些规定, 但是第6条你很难做到, 因为
-stp-
♀
(210 bytes)
()
04/06/2004 postreply
20:58:16
•
Not True!!!
-sdfadfa-
♀
(83 bytes)
()
04/06/2004 postreply
21:16:20
•
我是举个最省事的例子, 因为用护照不需要附加
-stp-
♀
(1026 bytes)
()
04/06/2004 postreply
21:34:16
•
回复:我知道这些规定, 但是第6条你很难做到, 因为
-H-1B_TAX-
♀
(675 bytes)
()
04/06/2004 postreply
21:22:38
•
我不是说了没有TREATY的可以试试, IRS的回复只供参考
-stp-
♀
(150 bytes)
()
04/06/2004 postreply
21:46:33
•
What's more: the tax rate
-sdfadfa-
♀
(15 bytes)
()
04/06/2004 postreply
21:23:51
•
right
-H-1B_TAX-
♀
(63 bytes)
()
04/06/2004 postreply
21:27:22