再问老猫

谢谢老猫的回复。

我在New Jersey, 根据你提供的线索，我找到了这些信息：

N.J. Stat. ?2A:156A-3: Interception of any wire, electronic or oral communication, or disclosure of the contents of such communication by someone having reason to know of the interception, is a crime. The disclosure of intercepted information is not a crime, however, if the contents of the communication have "become public knowledge or public information."

In addition, an interception is legal if the interceptor is a party to the communication, or one of the parties has given prior consent, so long as no criminal or tortious intent is present. Nonetheless, even if a person is a subscriber to a particular telephone, that person cannot consent to the recording of conversations on that telephone to which he is not a party. N.J. Stat. ?2A:156A-4.

Civil liability for unlawful interception or disclosure can be imposed for the greater of actual damages, $100 per day of violation or $1,000, and can include punitive damages, attorney fees and litigation costs. N.J. Stat. ?2A:156A-24.

这说明NJ是-one party only, 所以我录音不犯法。

我想再给他们电话，然后录下来，作为证据。因为与我通话时，有很多东西他们不否认，只是说不重要。但是如果在法庭上他如此说，就很明显撒谎。

如果我能证明（通过录音，和庭上对话），证明他们撒谎，并再合同之前误导我。这样成吗？

谢谢。

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：再问老猫 -單身老貓- ♂ (270 bytes) () 12/16/2006 postreply 17:17:56