回复:回复:seek to void the judgement for..

本帖于 2006-05-12 11:05:00 时间, 由 编辑
回答: seek to void the judgement for..why-why2006-05-09 23:34:43

she is actually lucky in that she did not respond. The reason? If she responded, technically, she would be surrendering her personal jurisdiction to the court -- right now, the court still has no jurisdiction over her. Therefore, she has the standing in challenging THIS specific judgement.

You are right in that a Chinese court can and will refuse the judgement by a PA court. The bottomline in this case is that if the guy wants to divorce, there is nothing she can do. But technically, she could avoid THIS judgement, and reopen the case somewhere else -- then, the problem would be to find a state that could assert personal jurisdiction over the guy, reopen the case, and get a better term on the alimony and child support.

Honestly, I would not slam an "no" answer to the person who ask the question. Really, she should consult a family law specialist in PA.

所有跟帖: 

回复:回复:回复:seek to void the judgement for.. -單身老貓- 给 單身老貓 发送悄悄话 (1646 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 08:08:25

回复:回复:回复:回复:seek to void the judgement for.. -yc2006- 给 yc2006 发送悄悄话 (291 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 10:14:04

回复:回复:回复:回复:seek to void the judgement for.. -why-why- 给 why-why 发送悄悄话 why-why 的博客首页 (3077 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 10:59:53

謝謝您的回答 ! 祝安康 ! -單身老貓- 给 單身老貓 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 12:47:06

thank YOU, truly, and take care! -why-why- 给 why-why 发送悄悄话 why-why 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 18:48:25

Thank YOU, truly, and take care! -why-why- 给 why-why 发送悄悄话 why-why 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 18:49:23

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!