I just called IRA. IRA said that

来源: 144021 于 2006-03-16 15:31:38 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (208 bytes)
回答: F1第六年起就不是exempt individual啦, 所以 由 stp 于 2006-03-16 13:36:39

in the 6th year, I should be treated as RA. I may not be able to take advantage of $5000 treaty exempt.

Since it has been already exempted from my W-2, I may need contact my former school to correct.

所有跟帖： 

• RA和TREATY不矛盾, ARTICLE 20的SAVING CLAUSE -stp- ♂ 给 stp 发送悄悄话 (142 bytes) () 03/16/2006 postreply 16:43:34

• You are right. I messed up these two terms. -144021- ♂ 给 144021 发送悄悄话 (699 bytes) () 03/16/2006 postreply 19:45:30

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！