回复：res ipsa loquitur

来源: 66196 于 2005-12-07 07:53:43 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (452 bytes)
本帖于 2006-01-03 08:15:59 时间, 由普通用户 stp 编辑
回答: 回复：我儿子也在BABY　GAP摔倒 由 68156 于 2005-12-06 22:08:05

You are right. RIL is a substitute to circumstantial evidence that will allow the jury to infer Gap's negligence. The jury can choose to infer or not infer. If they infer, they must bring a plaintiff verdict. The exclusive control, however, is refered to the injurious instrument, not the victim. In this case, it would be the floor. What it means is, Gap does the floor mopping/cleaning itself and no other person can alter the floor condition.

所有跟帖： 

• about control -68106- ♀ 给 68106 发送悄悄话 (331 bytes) () 12/07/2005 postreply 16:36:42

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！