你的应诉,只有事实和意见,没有法律依据。

本帖于 2022-05-04 12:45:48 时间, 由版主 柠檬椰子汁 编辑
回答: 应诉状konglongah2022-05-04 12:21:32

Legal writing has to separate arguments into sections.

NO

Denied: entry without permission, breaking in, harassing & humiliating plaintiff in front of people, threatening her to call police

YES

Denied: entry without permission,

The lease of xx/xx/xx provides that "landlord can enter with tenant's consent".  The consent does not have to be in writing. 

then state your fact. 

Therefore The allegation of "enter without permission" is not supported by the facts. 

Denied breaking in,

The legal definition of breaking in is "google your state law", or quote her complaint. 

state your fact

Therefore The allegation of "breaking into her apartment " is not supported by the facts. 

Denied harassing & humiliating plaintiff in front of people, threatening her to call police

find legal definition or quote her complaint

state your fact

...

 

 

所有跟帖: 

受教了 -konglongah- 给 konglongah 发送悄悄话 (24 bytes) () 05/04/2022 postreply 12:49:46

基本上按照她的起诉状的outline,逐项反驳 -柠檬椰子汁- 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 柠檬椰子汁 的博客首页 (98 bytes) () 05/04/2022 postreply 12:53:54

确实 -konglongah- 给 konglongah 发送悄悄话 (306 bytes) () 05/04/2022 postreply 13:04:40

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!