关于Email能否作为证据,我在老猫版主给的资料中读到以下叙述

Any email, text message, tweet, voicemail, or digital communication made by a party opponent that is introduced against him/her is not hearsay, as it is an admission under Rule 5-803(a)

我对这句话的的理解是,被告的Email 和text是可以用来作为证据起诉被告的。

这是老猫给的链接:

http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.barmont.org/resource/resmgr/Electronic_Evidence_Materials_May_14th/Admissibility_of_Electronic_.pdf

所有跟帖: 

前提是你能证明text和email是被告的。 -柠檬椰子汁- 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/18/2016 postreply 07:36:16

希望被告能诚实。在法庭上自己承认。 -理直气则壮- 给 理直气则壮 发送悄悄话 (128 bytes) () 04/18/2016 postreply 15:31:27

俺看你还是听老猫的, 去找个律师吧, 善良的愿望太多。 -hello2002- 给 hello2002 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/18/2016 postreply 16:06:20

让我再想想。谢谢您! -理直气则壮- 给 理直气则壮 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/19/2016 postreply 17:24:58

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!