1.Next door asphalt plant has license? We heard they have one from city, but city does not govern license for asphalt business. Until now we still do not know they have license or not since city confirmed there was no license for them in city’s database.
這是你們需要舉證的,不是讓政府單位來證明....所以這裡不應該是問句,而是陳束事實....
2.Noise issue, by-law Chapter 591, our property should be considered as residential area, and that senior home should be quiet zone. So it should be prohibited that equipment operation during night time, Sunday and holiday in this site. Also our tenants found in Ontario many asphalt plants are not permitted to operate in night time, why this one which is adjacent to our property and so closed to the senior home can operate 24 hours 7 days?
你需要提供具体的數據,例如某年某月某日,在幾點幾分用什麼樣的器材,錄得的噪音分貝數為多少,同時是誰紀錄的,誰見證的,原始資料存在那裡...
(噪音產生的連續性與來源必須明確標示,同時紀錄設備的位置與離噪音音緣的距離需要明確標示...(這些資料需要是一個獨立的附件)
3.We also require MOE to test dust in our place. The MOE officers took samples on May 7 & May 8, 2015. June 22 when Karen was here, I asked test result, she said: it is hard to say the dust is from asphalt plant, it could from city garbage transfer station, from go-train, from street. I told our tenants, they were angry, some called Karen, left message, did not get call back. We disagree with what MOE said, and want to talk with MOE about this.
你需要僱用獨立的第三者進行至少 60 -90 天連續觀測,同時必須同時提供氣象紀錄包括風向與風速,基本上你們必須證明這是連續同時是長期的影響而不是受到風巷與風速所造成的突發事件....你現在這個資料有相當多的問題...
4.Zoning by-law this area recycling operation and storage should be within a building. The asphalt plant uses waste asphalt/concrete to make asphalt, their operation and storage are out door. Their operation and storage should not be allowed.
同樣,你的證據在那裡? 是否有俱有公信力第三方來驗證這個資料的真實與準確性...
5.We also found next door asphalt plant use some equipment without ECA since last year, they took down one part early this year, but still use some. We do ask MOE to check their equipment with the ECA they got.
同樣,你的證據在那裡? 是否有俱有公信力第三方來驗證這個資料的真實與準確性...
6.We found some info the asphalt plant submitted to MOE for applying ECA are not true, we want MOE to check out.
同樣,你的證據在那裡? 是否有俱有公信力第三方來驗證這個資料的真實與準確性...
7.More important thing is: at the beginning when they applied for their first ECA, surrounding land use info was incorrect, they were/are too closed to sensitive land use, even too closed to municipal zoned residential area. The ECA should not be issued.
請定義,什麼是" sensitive land use",相關法規?
同時 請定義,什麼是" too closed to municipal zoned residential area",相關法規? (你的丈量的證據在那裡? 誰做的? 是否是否有俱有公信力的第三方來驗證這個資料的真實與準確性...
8.Ontario Environmental Protection Act Section 14 prohibits any discharge of contaminants into the natural environment if those contaminants cause or may cause an adverse effect. The EPA defines “adverse effect” as one or more of:
(a) impairment of the quality of the natural environment for any use that can be made of it,
(b) injury or damage to property or to plant or animal life,
(c) harm or material discomfort to any person,
(d) an adverse effect on the health of any person,
(e) impairment of the safety of any person,
(f) rendering any property or plant or animal life unfit for human use,
(g) loss of enjoyment of normal use of property, and
(h) interference with the normal conduct of business.
The above adverse effects can be found in our property easily. We disagree MOE says it’s already proved their operation no adverse effect.
您可以 Disagree,但是你的證據在那裡? " can be found in our property easily"是沒有用的,你的證明呢?
結論是
看過你的東西,證明您是用中國式的思考方式,您上訴狀,青天大老爺依您所承上的訴狀來查案,但是這不是在這裡處理行政訴訟的方式,這裡你代表訴訟方,你需要提供詳細的資料來證明你的指控,沒有這些實際的資料作為證據來支持你的指控,你根本不可能建立一個案件,
良心說,這證明了老貓先前的想法,您根本沒有諮詢過專業的律師,現在您這一切完全是"唐吉科德"是的作法,這是你目前最大問題也是為什麼沒有人理您的原因,因為人家只是把您看成一個經常抱怨的鄰居而不是一個提出真正訴訟的原告,你如果真正要進行這個維權企訴訟,,至少這個東西必須從頭到尾徹底重新做一次....
這是你們需要舉證的,不是讓政府單位來證明....所以這裡不應該是問句,而是陳束事實....
2.Noise issue, by-law Chapter 591, our property should be considered as residential area, and that senior home should be quiet zone. So it should be prohibited that equipment operation during night time, Sunday and holiday in this site. Also our tenants found in Ontario many asphalt plants are not permitted to operate in night time, why this one which is adjacent to our property and so closed to the senior home can operate 24 hours 7 days?
你需要提供具体的數據,例如某年某月某日,在幾點幾分用什麼樣的器材,錄得的噪音分貝數為多少,同時是誰紀錄的,誰見證的,原始資料存在那裡...
(噪音產生的連續性與來源必須明確標示,同時紀錄設備的位置與離噪音音緣的距離需要明確標示...(這些資料需要是一個獨立的附件)
3.We also require MOE to test dust in our place. The MOE officers took samples on May 7 & May 8, 2015. June 22 when Karen was here, I asked test result, she said: it is hard to say the dust is from asphalt plant, it could from city garbage transfer station, from go-train, from street. I told our tenants, they were angry, some called Karen, left message, did not get call back. We disagree with what MOE said, and want to talk with MOE about this.
你需要僱用獨立的第三者進行至少 60 -90 天連續觀測,同時必須同時提供氣象紀錄包括風向與風速,基本上你們必須證明這是連續同時是長期的影響而不是受到風巷與風速所造成的突發事件....你現在這個資料有相當多的問題...
4.Zoning by-law this area recycling operation and storage should be within a building. The asphalt plant uses waste asphalt/concrete to make asphalt, their operation and storage are out door. Their operation and storage should not be allowed.
同樣,你的證據在那裡? 是否有俱有公信力第三方來驗證這個資料的真實與準確性...
5.We also found next door asphalt plant use some equipment without ECA since last year, they took down one part early this year, but still use some. We do ask MOE to check their equipment with the ECA they got.
同樣,你的證據在那裡? 是否有俱有公信力第三方來驗證這個資料的真實與準確性...
6.We found some info the asphalt plant submitted to MOE for applying ECA are not true, we want MOE to check out.
同樣,你的證據在那裡? 是否有俱有公信力第三方來驗證這個資料的真實與準確性...
7.More important thing is: at the beginning when they applied for their first ECA, surrounding land use info was incorrect, they were/are too closed to sensitive land use, even too closed to municipal zoned residential area. The ECA should not be issued.
請定義,什麼是" sensitive land use",相關法規?
同時 請定義,什麼是" too closed to municipal zoned residential area",相關法規? (你的丈量的證據在那裡? 誰做的? 是否是否有俱有公信力的第三方來驗證這個資料的真實與準確性...
8.Ontario Environmental Protection Act Section 14 prohibits any discharge of contaminants into the natural environment if those contaminants cause or may cause an adverse effect. The EPA defines “adverse effect” as one or more of:
(a) impairment of the quality of the natural environment for any use that can be made of it,
(b) injury or damage to property or to plant or animal life,
(c) harm or material discomfort to any person,
(d) an adverse effect on the health of any person,
(e) impairment of the safety of any person,
(f) rendering any property or plant or animal life unfit for human use,
(g) loss of enjoyment of normal use of property, and
(h) interference with the normal conduct of business.
The above adverse effects can be found in our property easily. We disagree MOE says it’s already proved their operation no adverse effect.
您可以 Disagree,但是你的證據在那裡? " can be found in our property easily"是沒有用的,你的證明呢?
結論是
看過你的東西,證明您是用中國式的思考方式,您上訴狀,青天大老爺依您所承上的訴狀來查案,但是這不是在這裡處理行政訴訟的方式,這裡你代表訴訟方,你需要提供詳細的資料來證明你的指控,沒有這些實際的資料作為證據來支持你的指控,你根本不可能建立一個案件,
良心說,這證明了老貓先前的想法,您根本沒有諮詢過專業的律師,現在您這一切完全是"唐吉科德"是的作法,這是你目前最大問題也是為什麼沒有人理您的原因,因為人家只是把您看成一個經常抱怨的鄰居而不是一個提出真正訴訟的原告,你如果真正要進行這個維權企訴訟,,至少這個東西必須從頭到尾徹底重新做一次....
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”
