不能“如果不看白线“， 因为“能隐约从树缝间看到一条好象是白线”

不要说”如果不看白线“。对方提供的证据是假设”能隐约从树缝间看到一条好象是白线“。你需要挑战那个假设。

In the state of （your state), the standard for conviction of a crime requires the prosecution to show beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the violation cited.

However, the requirement of beyond reasonable doubt is not satisfied because the evidence against on the defendant is based on a mistaken presumption that the solid white line is visible in the video.

I am going to show that that the solid white line is not visible in the video because the following reasons:

First,...

Second...

Because the solid white line is not visible in the video, the prosecution have not established beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant's car passed the solid white line after the light changed to red.

所有跟帖： 

• 谢谢大哥回复，可能我没说清楚。 -GHDGHD- ♀ (473 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 09:52:39

• 建议你再读一遍 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (426 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 09:58:56

• 大哥的意思是我可以一口咬定录像中看不到白线，所以无法确定是否闯了红灯？ -GHDGHD- ♀ (105 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 09:58:36

• beyond reasonable doubt -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (244 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 10:01:09

• 谢谢了。 -GHDGHD- ♀ (12 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 10:48:32

• 涨知识了, 柠檬能不能介绍部涨正经法律知识(有关律师)的美剧, 这样学习又轻松又有效, 呵呵 -EMSWhite- ♂ (94 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 14:31:35