Another example, if the law prohibits "more than three unrelated person LIVING together", is a temporary guest "LIVING" together? A friend can visit for a few weeks, it is not "LIVING" together. In fact, many Chinese parents visit their US children for six months, but nobody says "my parents are living with me", they say "my parents are visiting for six months."
The law is what you argue it to be
所有跟帖:
•
next question: where do they live?
-慧惠-
♀
(476 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
17:45:06
•
谢高手,:)
-水中捞月-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
17:50:20
•
I was right, at least according to City of Norman, OK
-柠檬椰子汁-
♂
(712 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
17:52:22
•
如果规则这样定义,那没什么可争的,我反驳的,是你对related推断
-慧惠-
♀
(75 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
18:04:12
•
Water/Moon is right, according to Fort Collins, CO
-柠檬椰子汁-
♂
(266 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
17:55:39
•
看来只有当地的法规解释才是可靠的,谢谢你的Google.
-水中捞月-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
18:07:31
•
是的,房东也许有理,但很不友善。
-wolfkiller8-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
18:18:14
•
以你的才气,教教楼主如何反击这不友善的房东。
-水中捞月-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
18:33:26
•
才气没有,胆气有点,如果老猫不在,俺就大胆提议:大道至简,房东不善,罪不致死,刀不出鞘打屁屁十下!
-wolfkiller8-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
19:01:05
•
如果老猫向俺亮爪子,连这点胆气都要泄光了。
-wolfkiller8-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
19:04:58
•
谢谢你能读懂我,我刚才担心又犯‘原则错误’。
-慧惠-
♀
(210 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
18:56:39
•
ni这次的逻辑,照狼才子话说,是一针见血,直达源头。
-水中捞月-
♂
(42 bytes)
()
01/23/2015 postreply
19:42:07