I am aggressive because the company is violating the ADA. If LZ has adequate medical evidence, she qualifies as disabled (for certain length of time). Her company should provide reasonable accommodation.
Whether working from home is "reasonable" accommodation or not, depends on the facts. I assume her lawyer determined that it is reasonable. You don't get stuff in life without asking for it.
LZ can win on "reasonable accommodation under American Disabilit
所有跟帖:
•
据俺的理解,the comapny is not violating ADA,
-水中捞月-
♂
(651 bytes)
()
10/24/2014 postreply
21:47:40
•
你的理解不错,但是请看这个和LZ类似的2014的新案件
-lexm5-
♂
(352 bytes)
()
10/25/2014 postreply
05:39:39
•
那这真要看楼主对‘权’‘益’的想法了
-慧惠-
♀
(324 bytes)
()
10/25/2014 postreply
06:08:49
•
也是, 是权利应该争取。
-禾叶-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/24/2014 postreply
21:48:24