Exception that Proves the Rule

来源: lexm5 于 2014-10-09 11:40:31 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (845 bytes)
本帖于 2014-10-09 11:41:35 时间, 由普通用户 lexm5 编辑
回答: 加州有一个正在进行的案子. 由 花椒 于 2014-10-09 11:24:29

The case is here:

www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/california-governor-signs-law-force-billionaire-restore-beach-access-n216181

See how hard it is for the state to reopen the access road? They had to CHANGE THE LAW!

Even with the well-known much-gossiped sqatter's right, it is very rare and difficult to impose public easement on private property by adverse possession. LZ's biggest worry is not the loss of property right but tort liability of someone (trespasser) hurt on his property.

My point is:  "DANGER" sign is more important than "NO TRESPASS" sign.  

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！