M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have

来源: deerrocks 于 2011-07-07 13:02:38 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (161 bytes)
回答: 回复：如果你是V的律师，你会怎么做？ 由 apt 于 2011-07-07 10:03:39

given it as a payment to products/services years ago.  After all there is a gap of 130 years since the painting was known to be with the family.

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have -apt- ♂ 给 apt 发送悄悄话 apt 的博客首页 (198 bytes) () 07/07/2011 postreply 16:16:18

• the information is on google only because the BBC established th -deerrocks- ♀ 给 deerrocks 发送悄悄话 deerrocks 的博客首页 (1170 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 06:46:18

• 回复：the information is on google only because the BBC established -apt- ♂ 给 apt 发送悄悄话 apt 的博客首页 (192 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:14:09

• Sotheby's didn't exercise the policy when it auctioned off one o -deerrocks- ♀ 给 deerrocks 发送悄悄话 deerrocks 的博客首页 (101 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:26:17

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！