Google了一下，这篇文章值得一读

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/05/limited_benefits.html

Aetna有欺骗嫌疑:"Aetna’s clear intention was to hoodwink low-wage workers into believing erroneously that they were purchasing traditional health insurance."

你可能真的被公司的保险坑了:"We found that a particular policy set forth by Aetna had benefits so small as to be virtually worthless.  We were also concerned that people were led to believe they had significantly more coverage than they actually had. "

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 如果真的是的话，这点钱也不值得请律师呀？如果是当地的公司，还可以上小额法庭。 -我也有话说- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/17/2011 postreply 14:30:37

• 至少老貓的了解是,一般小额法庭不處理這一類保險理賠的糾紛. 這種案件需要在正式民事庭處理. -單身老貓- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/17/2011 postreply 15:03:38

• 回复：Google了一下，这篇文章值得一读 -有感而发- ♂ (191 bytes) () 05/17/2011 postreply 18:04:48

• 回复：回复：Google了一下，这篇文章值得一读 -catnip- ♀ (25 bytes) () 05/17/2011 postreply 19:09:23

• 真的被公司的保险坑了. Talk to lawyers to see if -N.- ♀ (29 bytes) () 05/17/2011 postreply 20:58:49

• 没错，而且Aetba的客户服务极差，等几个钟头都没人接听电话。 -catnip- ♀ (21 bytes) () 05/17/2011 postreply 19:07:50

• 没有这个经历。觉得最长等几分钟。给他们email都及时回我。 -爱娃- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/18/2011 postreply 07:09:42

• Consumer Affairs评论 -playdoh2- ♂ (219 bytes) () 05/18/2011 postreply 08:58:47

• 这篇是2007年的文章了。 如果有什么的话，不会现在都还在卖这个保险吧？ -如尘- ♀ (116 bytes) () 05/18/2011 postreply 17:23:45

• 回复：这篇是2007年的文章了。 如果有什么的话，不会现在都还在卖这个保险吧？ -playdoh2- ♂ (597 bytes) () 05/18/2011 postreply 19:42:19