回复:I don't think so

回答: I don't think soApt2011-04-16 22:19:39

Thanks for your reply. Both of us believe I shoulf have half of that 80%.

but our Attorney said, he own 100% of the property according CA law, and

also he has the 100% rental income from the townhouse in later years.

所有跟帖: 

回复: Rental Income is community property as well -有感而发- 给 有感而发 发送悄悄话 (143 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 13:19:31

按加州法律,这是他婚前财产,气人 -淡淡郁金香- 给 淡淡郁金香 发送悄悄话 淡淡郁金香 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 15:08:16

回复:按加州法律,这是他婚前财产,气人 -apt- 给 apt 发送悄悄话 apt 的博客首页 (476 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 23:22:00

Why? You and your husband acquired 80% of the house after marria -playdoh2- 给 playdoh2 发送悄悄话 (105 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 08:32:32

In CA law, He owns this property. Does not matter how much paid -淡淡郁金香- 给 淡淡郁金香 发送悄悄话 淡淡郁金香 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 11:45:33

回复:In CA law, He owns this property. Does not matter how much p -apt- 给 apt 发送悄悄话 apt 的博客首页 (638 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 12:02:12

like apt said, CA law didn't say he owns this property. -playdoh2- 给 playdoh2 发送悄悄话 (1160 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 12:41:11

What do you mean our attorney? Is the attorney representing both -apt- 给 apt 发送悄悄话 apt 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 15:06:39

协助协议离婚的中间律师,她的职责是解释法律条文和协调我们的财产分割 -淡淡郁金香- 给 淡淡郁金香 发送悄悄话 淡淡郁金香 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 16:26:45

这个律师是错的。如果有疑问就不要协议了,免得以后后悔。 -movingmountain- 给 movingmountain 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 13:37:42

回复:That guy is called mediator, not your attorney -有感而发- 给 有感而发 发送悄悄话 (405 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 22:07:03

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!