The reviewer's comment is worst that I have ever seen.
1) the reviewer complains about the rationality of this paper.
2) the reviewer complains about logic flow of your ideas.
Based on these two, it is really bad.
Maybe your ideas are so revolutionary that sounds very bizare to even the scientists with much imagination (astronomers). Can you share the article with us or at least part of it?
那就发表在这里,让我们看看是否逻辑。。
所有跟帖:
•
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0510535
-人类拯救计划-
♂
(122 bytes)
()
06/06/2010 postreply
10:04:58
•
我是谁?
-人类拯救计划-
♂
(1630 bytes)
()
06/06/2010 postreply
14:39:23
•
谢谢,拜读了你的大作,有以下粗略的感想。
-2ndglance-
♂
(646 bytes)
()
06/06/2010 postreply
20:34:52
•
那你就读一下别人的文章吧:
-人类拯救计划-
♂
(1698 bytes)
()
06/06/2010 postreply
20:52:48
•
假如你有反对圣经的证据,你打算怎么写??
-人类拯救计划-
♂
(156 bytes)
()
06/06/2010 postreply
21:01:14