那就发表在这里,让我们看看是否逻辑。。

回答: 量子江湖风雨录 ztxavet2010-06-05 22:29:05

The reviewer's comment is worst that I have ever seen.
1) the reviewer complains about the rationality of this paper.
2) the reviewer complains about logic flow of your ideas.

Based on these two, it is really bad.

Maybe your ideas are so revolutionary that sounds very bizare to even the scientists with much imagination (astronomers). Can you share the article with us or at least part of it?

所有跟帖: 

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0510535 -人类拯救计划- 给 人类拯救计划 发送悄悄话 人类拯救计划 的博客首页 (122 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 10:04:58

我是谁? -人类拯救计划- 给 人类拯救计划 发送悄悄话 人类拯救计划 的博客首页 (1630 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 14:39:23

谢谢,拜读了你的大作,有以下粗略的感想。 -2ndglance- 给 2ndglance 发送悄悄话 2ndglance 的博客首页 (646 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 20:34:52

那你就读一下别人的文章吧: -人类拯救计划- 给 人类拯救计划 发送悄悄话 人类拯救计划 的博客首页 (1698 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 20:52:48

假如你有反对圣经的证据,你打算怎么写?? -人类拯救计划- 给 人类拯救计划 发送悄悄话 人类拯救计划 的博客首页 (156 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 21:01:14

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!