满分作文生成器
http://beautyyu.top/full-mark-composition-generator/index.html
以下是一个sample：
生活在仙人掌上
现代计算机科学以艾伦·J·佩利的“有两种方法可以编写无错误的程序；只有第三种方法有效。”为嚆矢。滥觞于哲学与数学的期望正失去它们的借鉴意义。但面对看似无垠的未来天空，我想循林纳斯·托瓦兹“低水平程序员总在考虑代码，高水平程序员总在考虑数据结构及其之间的关系。”好过过早地振翮。
我们怀揣热忱的灵魂天然被赋予对超越性的追求，不屑于古旧坐标的约束，钟情于在别处的芬芳。但当这种期望流于对构造主义不假思索的批判，乃至走向直觉与逻辑主义时，便值得警惕了。与秩序的落差、错位向来不能为越矩的行为张本。而纵然我们已有翔实的蓝图，仍不能自持已在浪潮之巅立下了自己的沉锚。
“懦夫才用磁带备份：真男人把重要的东西传到ftp，然后世界会帮他备份。”林纳斯·托瓦兹之言可谓切中了肯綮。人的有限性是不可祓除的，而我们欲上青云也无时无刻不在因风借力。数学与哲学暂且被我们把握为一个薄脊的符号客体，一定程度上是因为我们尚缺乏体验与阅历去支撑自己的认知。而这种偏见的傲慢更远在知性的傲慢之上。
在孜孜矻矻以求计算机科学意义的道路上，对自己的期望本就是在与数学与哲学对接中塑型的动态过程。而我们的底料便是对不同最近公共祖先、不同网络流的觉感与体认。哈罗德·埃布尔森为西恩·帕伦特送去最大流最小割定理，又维系轮廓动态规划。他的计算机科学观念是厚实的，也是实践的。倘若我们在对过往借菲尔·卡尔顿之言“祓魅”后，又对不断膨胀的自我进行“赋魅”，那么在丢失外界预期的同时，未尝也不是丢了自我。
毫无疑问，从哲学与数学角度一觇的自我有偏狭过时的成分。但我们所应摒弃的不是对此的批判，而是其批判的廉价，其对批判投诚中的反智倾向。在林纳斯·托瓦兹的观念中，如果在成为狮子与孩子之前，略去了像骆驼一样背负前人遗产的过程，那其“永远重复”洵不能成立。
蓝图上的落差终归只是理念上的区分，在实践场域的分野也未必明晰。譬如当我们追寻启发式迭代加深时，在途中涉足P=NP猜想，这究竟是伴随着期望的泯灭还是期望的达成？在我们塑造计算机科学的同时，计算机科学也在浇铸我们。既不可否认原生的离散性与无后效性，又承认自己的图景有轻狂的失真，不妨让体验走在言语之前。用不被禁锢的头脑去体味大卫·韦勒的大海与风帆，并效林纳斯·托瓦兹，对无法言说之事保持沉默。
用在仙人掌上的生活方式体现个体的超越性，保持婞直却又不拘泥于所谓“遗世独立”的单向度形象。这便是菲尔·卡尔顿为我们提供的理想期望范式。生活在仙人掌上——始终热爱大地——升上天空。
然后再股狗翻译一下：
Live on cactus
Modern computer science uses Alan J. Paley's "There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third method is effective." The expectations that originated in philosophy and mathematics are losing their reference. But facing the seemingly boundless sky of the future, I would like to follow Linus Torvalds, "low-level programmers are always thinking about code, and high-level programmers are always thinking about data structures and the relationships between them." It is too early. Earth Zhenhui.
Our passionate soul is naturally endowed with the pursuit of transcendence, disdainful of the constraints of the old coordinates, and love the fragrance elsewhere. But when this kind of expectation flows into a critique of constructivism without thinking, or even to intuition and logic, it is worthy of vigilance. The gaps and dislocations with order have never been a violation of the law. And even though we have a detailed blueprint, we still can't hold ourselves to have set our own anchor on the top of the wave.
"The coward uses tape to backup: a real man uploads important things to ftp, and the world will back it up for him." Linus Torvalds' words can be said to have hit Ken Qi. The finitude of human beings is inextricable, and we want to go to the sky all the time because of the wind. Mathematics and philosophy are temporarily grasped by us as a thin-spine symbolic object, partly because we still lack experience and experience to support our own cognition. And the arrogance of this prejudice is farther than the arrogance of intellectual.
On the road of diligently seeking the meaning of computer science, the expectation of oneself is a dynamic process of shaping in the docking with mathematics and philosophy. And our basic material is the perception and realization of different recent public ancestors and different network flows. Harold Ebleson sent Sean Parent theorem of maximum flow and minimum cut and maintained dynamic contour planning. His concept of computer science is solid and practical. If we "enchant" the ever-expanding self after borrowing the words of Phil Carlton in the past, then we may not lose ourselves while losing outside expectations.
There is no doubt that the philosophical and mathematical self has elements of narrow and outdated. But what we should abandon is not the criticism of this, but the cheapness of its criticism, and its anti-intellectual tendency in surrender to criticism. In Linus Torvalds' concept, if the process of carrying the legacy of the predecessors like a camel is omitted before becoming a lion and a child, then the "forever repetition" cannot be established.
The gap on the blueprint is ultimately just a distinction between ideas, and the distinction in the field of practice may not be clear. For example, when we pursue the deepening of heuristic iterations and get involved in the P=NP conjecture on the way, is this accompanied by the disappearance of expectations or the fulfillment of expectations? While we are shaping computer science, computer science is also shaping us. It is undeniable that the original discreteness and no aftereffect, but also admits the frivolous distortion of one's own picture, it is better to let the experience go before the words. Use an unfettered mind to appreciate the sea and sails of David Weller, and follow the example of Linus Torvalds to remain silent about the indescribable.
The lifestyle used on the cactus reflects the transcendence of the individual, keeping straight but not sticking to the unidirectional image of the so-called "independence of the world." This is the ideal expectation paradigm provided by Phil Carlton. Living on cacti-always loving the earth-and rising to the sky.
一篇辣鸡文就出炉啦
