NO

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parol_evidence_rule#Overview

The rule applies to parol evidence, as well as other extrinsic evidence (such as written correspondence that does not form a separate contract) regarding a contract. If a contract is in writing and final to at least one term (integrated), parol or extrinsic evidence will generally be excluded.[2] However, there are a number of exceptions to this general rule, including for partially integrated contracts, agreements with separate consideration, to resolve ambiguities, or to establish contract defenses.

To take an example, Carl agrees in writing to sell Betty a car for $1,000, but later, Betty argues that Carl earlier told her that she would only need to pay Carl $800. The parol evidence rule would generally prevent Betty from testifying to this alleged conversation because the testimony ($800) would directly contradict the written contract's terms ($1,000).

所有跟帖： 

• 谢谢，次序是这样的：lease在先，后来我问怎么才能transfer lease给想接手的人， -米小- ♀ (273 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:26:22

• 该7月1号转，我想坚持不去掉我的名字就不转。 -米小- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:36:38

• 我宁愿办公室空着都不要给别人做担保人 -米小- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:55:00

• 这不是做生意，这是赌气，生意场的大忌。 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:58:16

• 我有风险考虑，与其给别人担保，不如自己花钱花心思找人做 -米小- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 11:15:18

• 那就只好等lease到期再转手了 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (124 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 11:23:44

• 多谢了！ -米小- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 11:28:17

• 你的最佳结果就是加第三者的名字，不要乱搞买卖公司，你的名字是除不掉的 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (189 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:56:38

• 谢谢，我明白了。那我选择不让出办公室，卖公司的事property manager有责任,是她让我们买卖公司的。 -米小- ♀ (75 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 11:08:48